<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My foray into tweetcoding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougmccune.com/blog/2009/02/26/my-foray-into-tweetcoding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougmccune.com/blog/2009/02/26/my-foray-into-tweetcoding/</link>
	<description>A blog about Adobe Flex</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Tretola</title>
		<link>http://dougmccune.com/blog/2009/02/26/my-foray-into-tweetcoding/comment-page-1/#comment-207639</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Tretola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmccune.com/blog/?p=471#comment-207639</guid>
		<description>Doug, you rick rolling bastard!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, you rick rolling bastard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roxy</title>
		<link>http://dougmccune.com/blog/2009/02/26/my-foray-into-tweetcoding/comment-page-1/#comment-207621</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmccune.com/blog/?p=471#comment-207621</guid>
		<description>owned! good one :}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>owned! good one :}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Beck</title>
		<link>http://dougmccune.com/blog/2009/02/26/my-foray-into-tweetcoding/comment-page-1/#comment-207604</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmccune.com/blog/?p=471#comment-207604</guid>
		<description>Jerk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Si Forster</title>
		<link>http://dougmccune.com/blog/2009/02/26/my-foray-into-tweetcoding/comment-page-1/#comment-207603</link>
		<dc:creator>Si Forster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmccune.com/blog/?p=471#comment-207603</guid>
		<description>Mate, this is a brilliant entry. I went for the &quot;do something complicated&quot; approach but I much prefer your simple and effective approach!

http://www.twitter.com/siforster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mate, this is a brilliant entry. I went for the &#8220;do something complicated&#8221; approach but I much prefer your simple and effective approach!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.twitter.com/siforster" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com/siforster</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin Luck</title>
		<link>http://dougmccune.com/blog/2009/02/26/my-foray-into-tweetcoding/comment-page-1/#comment-207602</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin Luck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmccune.com/blog/?p=471#comment-207602</guid>
		<description>You can compile your tweetcodes with mxmlc so you should be able to use Flex Builder... I just wrote a blog post which includes the as class I&#039;m using to compile from: http://www.kelvinluck.com/2009/02/tweetcoding-140-characters-of-actionscript-3/ - it&#039;s basically the same as what the machine501 compiling robot does...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can compile your tweetcodes with mxmlc so you should be able to use Flex Builder&#8230; I just wrote a blog post which includes the as class I&#8217;m using to compile from: <a href="http://www.kelvinluck.com/2009/02/tweetcoding-140-characters-of-actionscript-3/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kelvinluck.com/2009/02/tweetcoding-140-characters-of-actionscript-3/</a> &#8211; it&#8217;s basically the same as what the machine501 compiling robot does&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake K.</title>
		<link>http://dougmccune.com/blog/2009/02/26/my-foray-into-tweetcoding/comment-page-1/#comment-207601</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmccune.com/blog/?p=471#comment-207601</guid>
		<description>To be really clever, you could successively build up an application where tweet 1 lays the base code, tweet 2 imports that compiled swf and extends it, and so on.  That would also be a stretch of the rules, but if it&#039;s like the International Obfuscated C Code Contest, finding clever ways to break the rules is fair play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be really clever, you could successively build up an application where tweet 1 lays the base code, tweet 2 imports that compiled swf and extends it, and so on.  That would also be a stretch of the rules, but if it&#8217;s like the International Obfuscated C Code Contest, finding clever ways to break the rules is fair play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
